Relativism vs. Objectivism in Aesthetic Evaluation Essay

Relativism vs. Objectivism in Aesthetic Evaluation - Essay ExampleIn accordance with Young (2003) the esthetical value mass be determinationive or subjective, being influenced by the criteria used for evaluating a particular event/ object (Young 2003 p.117). On the other hand, it should be made clear that a work of art is considered as having no value when the specific work of art has no effect on people. Moreover, the evaluation of a work of art should be primarily based on the potential benefits that the specific piece would secure for the existence (Young 2003). In any case, when no reference is made to the pleasure that a particular work of art bottom offer to the public, then the evaluation of the specific work of art can be characterized as invalid. The identification of the influence of objectivism and relativism on the esthetical evaluation is a difficult task. In terms of its nature, aesthetical value is a concept used for explaining the value of an object based on its characteristics. In accordance with Bunnin and Yu (2004) the aesthetic value can be set forth as the properties rendering a work of art good or successful, such as balance, charm and elegance (Bunnin and Yu 17). Aesthetic value, in the above sense, can be focus on different characteristics of a work of art, such as its colour or its significance for the society (Bunnin and Yu 17). ... Then, their role in aesthetic evaluation would be made clear. It should be noted that the existing theory on relativism and objectivism, especially regarding the aesthetic evaluation, is based on different approaches, mostly because of the spacious use of these concepts in explaining the response of individuals to their external environment. It should be noted that the relevant put ons will be presented and analyzed, as possible, especially in regard to their relation to aesthetic evaluation. In accordance with Baghramian (2004) relativism can have three different pretends it can be characteriz ed as subjective, social and conceptual (Baghramian 7). Subjective relativism is based on the view that aesthetic evaluations are depended on the beliefs of individual thinkers (Baghramian 7). The above type of relativism is differentiated from social relativism, which highlights the importance of social conditions as a criterion for the development of aesthetic evaluation. Moreover, conceptual relativism is highly based on ontology and scientific paradigms (Baghramian 7), which can be used every time that an object or an event has to be evaluated in terms of its aesthetic status or quality (Baghramian 7). Among the three forms of relativism presented above, the one that most reflects the role of relativism in aesthetic evaluation is the first one, the subjective relativism. This form of relativism is clearly opposed to objectivism, as a concept also reviewed in this paper, especially as of its use in aesthetic evaluation. At the same time, relativism can result to the different eva luation of aesthetic properties. More specifically, in the context