Dworkins Distinction Between Ethics and Morality Essay

Dworkins Distinction Between morals and Morality - Essay ExampleCertainly, morals are informed by both majorities and minorities4 and it, therefore, makes mind that standards are set, regulated and enforced by via executive functions. For Dworkin, it is within this paradigm that the governmental biotic conjunction exists. The governmental community is a pivotal point of individual and collective identity. Depending on whether or not the political community is successful or not, members of the community will either perceive that the political community enhances the calibre of our lives or limits it.5 According to Dworkin, morals and religions differ and conflict among groups and gum olibanum it is impossible to construct a universal legal or communal code that embodies wholly moral and religious ideologies and values. Thus, political communities set limits and standards for all.6 In this regard, Dworkins conceptualization of the relationship between morality and ethics explain s the relationship between morality and the faithfulness in a way that is consistent with Rawls idea of justice.7 For Rawls, justice is achieved by setting standards, but by avoiding prohibiting moral and religious beliefs that deviate from the established standards. A just society instead will sustain the views of differents.8 Similarly, Dworkin advocates for a political textile that takes a neutral stance in that it does not favor angiotensin converting enzyme set of religious or moral values over another.9 Rawls conceptualization of justice and the political community is more than realistic than Dworkins theory. It is conceivable that a legal and/or political framework layabout set and enforce specific moral standards and at the same time recognize and tolerate other religious and moral standards that are different from the normative standard. This would accord with ideas of equality. Thus Rawls theory of political liberalism makes more sense than Dworkins theory of libera l community. Dworkin advocates for a neutral framework while admitting that it is impossible to pronounce a universal moral code. Arguably, in order to be neutral, the political communitys framework must reflect the common values of all members of the community. The values and morals of some members of the political community will be left out since the liberal community must determine and set standards for all to follow. Therefore, Dworkins theory of liberal community is a bit contradictory. Nevertheless, Dworkin insists that truth and the liberal community that informs the law is beneficial to members of the community because it formulates standards thus facilitating fairness and certainty. It also ensures that members of the community are treated equally and thus makes the community more sincere and enhances the moral rationale for the exercise of executive powers.10 The difficulty with this aspect of Dworkins reasoning, however, is that the executive may decide to treat all mem bers of a community with equal oppression.11 In such(prenominal) a case, would the executive have a moral justification for the exercise of its powers? The answer according to Gough and Stables is be in Dworkins general assumption that the liberal community is structured around respect for rights and high-handedness of the members of the community.